Not All Games Are Created Equal,
By Big Al McMordie
November means college football rivalries! Many rivalry games can mean far
more in importance than other games during the season. Some teams having mediocre
seasons can make all the disappointment go away in three hours on a Saturday
afternoon by sticking it to a state or conference rival.
Michigan State and Michigan have already battled this season. The Spartans intercepted
three of Denard Robinson's passes -- one in the end zone, one just outside of
it -- and scored 24 unanswered points to break open a close game in a 34-17
rout of the Wolverines. How important was it? For the first time since 1965-67,
Michigan State won three straight in the series.
"Maybe someday the little brother believes he can compete with the big brother,"
said Coach Mark Dantonio, who was stung in his first season at Michigan State
by the Wolverines.
"It's pretty big," Spartan star linebacker Greg Jones said. "Especially after
my freshman year, losing that lead and the comments that were made. That's the
worst feeling you could have. Nobody wants to hear that."
Now, Michigan State was unbeaten at the time, but notice how the coach and one
of the players were still remembering blowing a lead to the Wolverines four
years ago! Other times, teams having a terrible season can put all their eggs
in one rivalry basket to have a great memory from what would otherwise be a
forgettable campaign.
Pitt is zeroing in on a Big East title this month, but UConn used home field
and extra motivation to stun the Panthers last week, 30-28, their first conference
defeat. The Huskies had averaged just 12 points in their previous three games
while going 1-2 SU/ATS, but looked like a very different team against the Panthers.
It was a combination of several emotional factors coming together: home field,
a national TV audience, and the chance to knock off a conference front-runner.
The Huskies were also 4-4 coming in, so they needed a win to have a chance at
making a bowl. Rivalry games and meaningful battles like this can force coaches
and players to do unorthodox things. In that game, UConn Coach Randy Edsall
decided to gamble. On a fourth-and-1 from the UConn 19 with 2:50 left, Edsall
called timeout and decided to go for it deep in his own end. RB Jordan Todman,
who blew up the Pitt defense for 222 yards on 37 carries, gained four, and proceeded
to run out the final four minutes to preserve a huge win for the Huskies. "When
you have confidence in your offensive line and the running back, it makes the
decision easier," Edsall said. "I just wanted us to control our own destiny."
That's the thing about conference rivalry games late in the season: previous
stats, matchups and handicapping dynamics don't always apply, with new variables
taking center stage. When analyzing games from a handicapping point of view,
one must think outside the box at times, as Coach Edsall did on fourth and one.
And this can present opportunities to play on a team or against one. For instance,
one season I had my Big 10 Game of the Year on Penn State when they were 4-point
dog to Michigan State. It was more than just matchups. Michigan State was off
a big win over conference rival Wisconsin 49-14, as a dog, and likely to be
emotionally flat. Michigan State actually fell into a 42-104 against the spread
angle off an upset win as a +6 or more dog. I was not shocked to see underdog
Penn State thoroughly dominate play in a 37-13 win as the sloppy Spartans were
not focused, turning the ball over five times. In addition to a play against
Michigan State, I also noticed that Penn State was in a 14-5 ATS revenge angle.
There were far more than stats featured in that game - revenge and emotion were
enormous factors in Penn State's favor.
Keep this in mind over the next few weeks with emotional/rivalry games taking
place like Michigan/Ohio State, Army/Navy, Texas A&M/Texas, Oklahoma State/Oklahoma,
USC/UCLA and Auburn/Alabama. Think twice-beaten Alabama would like to stick
it to Auburn, the team getting all the headlines of late?
One time I recall Vanderbilt players, during the week of the rivalry game with
Tennessee, refer to the fact that the Vols had shut them out the previous three
years. In fact, the players were angry, adamantly deflecting suggestions that
they had packed in the season. The Commodores' veteran offense had a great chance
to end that drought against a Tennessee defense that had slipped down the stretch.
Again, there was a revenge angle present for Vandy, though not on beating up
Tennessee, but simply playing hard and putting the ball in the end zoneā¦and
they did, exploding for 33 points in a 37-33 defeat, but an easy cover as a
two-TD dog.
These are great examples why analyzing stats only goes so far in the world of
professional handicapping. Angles, revenge, rivalry games and other situations
also play significant roles late in the college football campaign. Good luck,
as always...Al McMordie.
|